a shark would not be a good index fossil because - index fossils facts : 2024-10-30 a shark would not be a good index fossil becauseA shark would not be a good index fossil because A. it doesn't have structures that can be preserved in a fossil. B. salt water would degrade the fossil over time. C. the species has survived for too long. D. no fossil records exist for sharks. a shark would not be a good index fossil becauseThis is a comprehensive guide aimed towards players entering endgame — Level 90 — for the first time and getting overwhelmed with Final Fantasy XIV’s gear progression systems. This guide will help you get an understanding of how FFXIV’s endgame systems work, as well as how to gear up and what types of endgame PvE content exist. Step 1.
Unlocks. Rewards. Brother from Another Mother. 30. Gagaruna. Monk. Rockbreaker. Monk (Simple) Adventurer Plate. 1 Soul of the Monk.
a shark would not be a good index fossil because
A good index fossil must meet several requirements: it must have lived and died within a relatively short timeframe, it must be geographically widespread, and it .
a shark would not be a good index fossil becauseIndex fossil, any animal or plant preserved in the rock record of the Earth that is characteristic of a particular span of geologic time or environment. A useful index fossil .Index fossils are distinctive, widespread, abundant, and limited in geologic time. They are used to define periods of geologic time and to identify rock ages. A shar.
46-50: Ceruleum Processing Plant (Northern Thanalan) Fates are sorted by Level, however, there are maps below that may help show you where FATES are, as well. You can view a list sorted by Zone here. Recommend FATES are highlighted.
a shark would not be a good index fossil because